Problem Solving: Modular Systems
Modern data systems are "systems of systems." We can combine discrete LEGO blocksβSQL, LSM Trees, H3, LSHβto address specific use cases.
Goal 1: Artist-Facing UI for Royalty Stats
Problem: Artists want to analyze geographical trends and custom date ranges (e.g., influence after a song release). How do you support fast range queries on trillions of listens?
π Show Solution
-
Logic: Use a SQL engine for counts and zip-code mapping.
-
Indexing: Create a B+ Tree Index on
Listens <song_id, date>. -
The "Why": Date ranges are sequential. A B+ Tree allows you to jump to the start date and scan forward.
Goal 2: Fan Preference Clustering
Problem: You need to find clusters of similar users or songs for targeted marketing. How do you search through high-dimensional feature vectors?
π Show Solution
-
Concept: Embeddings + Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH).
-
Design: Generate embeddings (lyrics, tempo, etc.) and use an LSH Index to bucket similar vectors together.
-
The "Why": Standard indexes (B+ Tree) fail in high dimensions. LSH maps "similar" items to the same hash bucket with high probability.
Goal 3: Local Fan Club Meetups
Problem: How do you identify hyper-local communities when zip codes are too coarse? You need to find zones with > 100 fans for "listen parties."
π Show Solution
-
Concept: Geo-Hashing (H3).
-
Design: Map user addresses to H3 cells. Run:
GROUP BY H3(address) HAVING count(user) > 100. -
The "Why": H3 provides a hierarchical grid system. Most databases support this via extensions like PostGIS.
Goal 4: "Live" Taylor Swift Drops
Problem: 50,000 users tune into a live song drop at once. A standard B+ Tree would suffer from random write overhead. How do you scale these updates?
π Show Solution
-
Concept: LSM Trees.
-
Design: Use an LSM Tree to manage the write surge. Keep partial counts in a MemTable and flush to SSTables.
-
The "Why": LSM Trees turn random writes into sequential flushes. It is the gold standard for high-bandwidth telemetry data.
Goal 5: Handling Viral Surges
Problem: How do you distribute table traffic across a cluster of machines when a song goes viral?
π Show Solution
-
Concept: Hash Partitioning.
-
Design: Partition the data across nodes using a Hash function on
song_idoruser_id. -
The "Why": This balances the load on reads and writes, preventing "hot spots" and enabling massive parallelism.
Goal 6: Privacy-Preserving Recommendations
Problem: You want to expose a SQL API for third-party concert apps but must protect individual user privacy on aggregates.
π Show Solution
-
Concept: Differential Privacy.
-
Design: Integrate Differential Privacy noise into the SQL results (e.g., using BigQuery's built-in DP functions).
-
The "Why": DP mathematically guarantees that the presence of one user's data won't significantly change the aggregate result.
Goal 7: Messy External Data (ETL)
Problem: You ingest lyrics and album covers from messy third-party feeds. How do you ensure quality and allow for rollbacks?
π Show Solution
-
Concept: Versioned Tables + Reconciliation.
-
Design: Implement an ETL pipeline with cleaning/normalization steps. Store results in versioned tables.
-
The "Why": Messy data is inevitable. Versioning allows you to revert to a "last known good" state and reconciles feeds against original source logs.
Takeaway: We solve complex problems by combining discrete LEGO blocks: Clustering for batching, Hashing for searching/partitioning, and LSM for write scale.