Concurrency Full Stack π
Every time you write BEGIN TRANSACTION, your query travels through four critical layers:
| Your Code | BEGIN TRANSACTION; UPDATE accounts...; COMMIT; |
| Database | Lock Manager β’ Conflict Detection β’ Deadlock Prevention |
| Operating System | Mutex β’ Semaphore β’ Spinlock β’ Thread Scheduling |
| Hardware | CAS Instructions β’ Memory Barriers β’ Cache Coherence |
Each layer builds abstractions on the lower layer, all to answer one fundamental question: How do we let thousands of transactions run simultaneously without stepping on each other?
Key Definitions π
π¦ Concurrent Transactions
A set of transactions executing in a (small) time window
βοΈ Concurrency Control Algorithms
Help manage concurrent access to shared data when you have (slow) IO devices
π Locks
Data structures (popular) that these algorithms use to coordinate access
Kitchen Chaos: Three Ways to Share a Kitchen π³
The Problem: Multiple chefs, one kitchen. Everyone needs different ingredients. How to coordinate?
π Pessimistic Chef
Strategy: Lock only what you need
Others can make sushi, grill fish, bake desserts
Trade-off: Good parallelism until sushi needs tomatoes
π― Optimistic Chef
Strategy: Grab freely, check at serving
"Wait, we both used the last tomato?"
Trade-off: Max speed until collision
π Multi-Version Chef
Strategy: Uhm... let's use Github at all prep stages
"Current file"
Trade-off: No waits, but storage overhead
The Insight: The art is choosing the right strategy for your workloas. High conflict (everyone wants tomatoes)? Go pessimistic. Rare conflicts? Go optimistic. Read-heavy? Multi-version.
Three Philosophies of Concurrency π
Now that we understand the kitchen analogy, let's see how databases actually implement these approaches:
π Pessimistic: "Lock Everything First"
Strategy: Acquire ALL needed locks before touching ANY data
β Limited parallelism
π― Optimistic: "Lock Nothing, Validate Later"
Strategy: Do all work freely, then check for conflicts at commit
β Must restart on conflicts
π Multi-Version: "Everyone Gets Their Own View"
Strategy: Keep multiple versions of every piece of data
β Storage overhead & garbage collection
π Modern Hybrid: "Best of All Worlds"
Strategy: Combine techniques based on workload patterns
β Complex implementation
Why OS vs Database Locks? π€
You might wonder: "Why can't databases just use regular OS locks?" Here's the key difference:
π₯οΈ OS Locks (Mutex, Semaphore)
Purpose: Simple thread coordination
β’ No data awareness
β’ Manual deadlock detection
β’ Thread-level coordination
ποΈ Database Lock Manager
Purpose: Sophisticated data coordination
β’ Tableβpageβrow awareness
β’ Automatic deadlock resolution
β’ Million-transaction scale
Today's Challenge: Coordinate millions of AI agents and microservices, all hitting the same database simultaneously. π€
What You'll Learn Next π―
This section will take you through the complete concurrency control journey:
-
Lock Foundations - How database locks actually work
-
Two-Phase Locking - The gold standard protocol
-
Microschedules - Reasoning about concurrent execution
-
Correctness - Proving your system won't corrupt data
-
Connecting Together - Putting it all into practice
By the end, you'll understand how databases achieve the seemingly impossible: letting thousands of transactions run concurrently while maintaining perfect data consistency.
π The Core Insight
Concurrency control isn't just about preventing conflictsβit's about enabling massive parallelism while maintaining the illusion that each transaction runs alone.
Every technique we'll explore is a different answer to: "How do we coordinate access to shared data at web scale?"